Showing posts with label National Arts Index. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Arts Index. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

In other news: The Arts Index was down 3.6 points

By Barry Johnson

The National Arts Index closed the year 2009 DOWN 3.6 points, according to the annual study commissioned by the non-profit advocacy group, Americans for the Arts.

Built on 81 separate reports of arts activity, the index is always a year behind, so it's not surprising that 2009 wasn't very good. Maybe it's surprising that it wasn't truly dismal -- because some of those individual reports certainly were.
  • Art museum visits were down 19 points from 2003, the baseline year in the Index, and the population share of museum visitors was down more than a quarter.
  • Attendance at symphony, dance, opera and theatre was down 25 points.
  • Philanthropic giving to the arts was down 11 points.
  • State funding of the arts was down substantially. 
  • Non-profits struggled financially, with more than 40 percent running deficits in 2009.
  • Between 2003 and 2009, the percentage of the population attending art museums and performing arts 
    events both decreased (‐19 percent and ‐22 percent, respectively).
I'm interested in "audience engagement" numbers, and those were mixed. Yes, attendance at theaters, museums and concert halls was down, but five percent more of the population made their own art in 2009 than in 2003.   And the number of people employed in the arts stayed steady as the number of non-profit arts organizations increased. The level of activity was high, even though it wasn't supported as well nor seen by as many people.

The overall index includes publishing, popular music and movie attendance data, tracking the decline of CD and book sales, for example, as both the music and publishing businesses struggled to find new business models to support themselves. So, they are taking "arts" broadly. I have no idea how they are accounting for developments in self-publishing, self-recording, small-scale movie making, etc. Data I've seen indicates that the raw number of books published in the U.S. these days is enormous, though in microscopic editions, for example, and that's not taking eBooks into consideration.